What are in Fact Quality Backlinks?

Almost every day, people ask me what quality backlinks are? It can't happen to me right away, but answering that question is very simple. Most believe that any backlink on a relevant site with a decent Google Page Rank is a "quality" link. I disagree After all, I've built tons of backlinks on relevant pages with a fair equation, and I've still seen little or no change in the SERPs. This is why:

First, with the amount of spam available and a large number of marketers trying to play with Google every day, the search giant is always looking for new ways to analyze the quality of backlinks. They found thousands of ways to accomplish this over the years, but it really does matter which method differentiates what Google really wants, which is a real "voice" another site or exists only to move on. in the placements.

If the link according to Google is a natural "vote" for another site that counts as a quality PBN Backlinks. If it is discovered that there is only one link to make the site increasing in the ranges, it will not be considered a quality backlink, or it may be considered less important. So if you want to create quality backlinks, this is what you should consider: must be natural "voices" or at least so appear to Google.

Fortunately for you, it is much simpler than you think. In fact, there are many different ways to obtain links that take into account Google Ranking requirements. These include forum posts, social media marketing, answers to Yahoo! Answer, among others. I learned that a durable quality backlink can be obtained from the links included in weblog publications. It is definitely the highest quality backlinks that you can create for your website.

How? It's easy. If the blog is not yours (and does not plan illegal activities like hacking a blog) and you pay the owner of the blog to publish your links (prohibitively expensive) is very difficult to get links like this. Nine times out of ten links in blog posts are natural, the voices created by users, so Google takes them so seriously.

To demonstrate this to yourself, check out the high Wikipedia pages and their backlinks. If you carefully examine your backlinks, you will see that most come from blog posts with related topics. Given that Wikipedia is ranked well even in very competitive terms, does it not seem reasonable to mimic its tactics?

It's good that there are other ways to get quality backlinks, as blog posts can be extremely expensive. Consider this: What is the difficulty level of the backlinks you create, and that is something people do on their own? Chances are if it's really hard for an average person to come and create many backlinks manually, and most people think these backlinks are natural, it's very likely that Google also knows it and takes your backlinks seriously.